ACE, Groups Respond to Education Department’s Proposal to Rewrite Trump Administration’s Free Inquiry Rule March 27, 2023 Section 1 ContentIn September 2021, the Department of Education announced it was conducting a review of the Trump-era regulations commonly referred to as the “free inquiry” final rule, a response to an executive order issued by the former president which directed agencies to take all steps consistent with existing laws to encourage free inquiry on campuses. The free inquiry rule conditions getting Department of Education grant funding (excluding Title IV student aid) on a public institution complying with the First Amendment and on a private institution complying with its free speech related policies. In addition, it prohibits a public institution from denying a religious student organization any “right, benefit, or privilege afforded to other student organizations” because of the religious organization’s “beliefs, practices, policies, speech, membership standards, or leadership standards.” In 2020, ACE and several higher education associations submitted written comments expressing serious concerns with the proposed rule. But the rule was finalized in September of that year, virtually unchanged. Last month, ED announced a proposal to rescind the portion of the rule related to religious student organizations. At the same time, the department issued a request for information (RFI) on the first part of the rule related to the withholding of ED grant funds from institutions that fall to comply with the First Amendment (for publics) and with their stated policies and procedures on free speech (for privates). On March 24, ACE and a number of other higher education groups responded, outlining support for revoking the provision on student religious organizations. In addition, in response to the RFI, ACE and the other higher ed associations restated their concerns with provisions related to termination of federal grant funding, writing that they “undermine rather than support institutional efforts to foster environments that promote open, intellectually engaging debate on diverse topics on campus.”Denying a Religious Student Organizations any “Right Benefit or Privilege”The free inquiry rule prohibits a public institution from denying a religious student organization any “right, benefit, or privilege (including full access to the facilities of the public institution and official recognition of the organization) afforded to other student organizations” because of the religious student organization’s “beliefs, practices, policies, speech, membership standards, or leadership standards.”In explaining its rationale for proposing to rescind this regulation, ED said that it has “not seen evidence that the regulation has provided meaningfully increased protection for religious student organizations beyond the robust First Amendment protections that already exist, much less that it has been necessary to ensure they are able to organize and operate on campus.” The department also said the rules had caused confusion about college and university nondiscrimination requirements, and that it had been burdensome to investigate claims about institutions’ treatment of student organizations. ACE and the other higher education association signers strongly agreed with this assessment, writing that the provision rests “on a deeply flawed and troubling understanding of First Amendment jurisprudence and the proper obligations and roles of institutions, the Department, and the judiciary in upholding these guarantees.”Of fundamental concern here is is that the free inquiry regs inappropriately foreclose legally permitted decision-making by public colleges and universities regarding all-comer policies, based on the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez. “Federal regulations should not interfere with these rights,” the groups wrote, “nor should they put public institutions in the untenable position of losing Department grant funding for exercising these rights.”Groups Urge ED to Scrap the Remaining Regulations in the Free Inquiry Rule Responding to the RFI seeking general input, the groups write that the current rules “reflect a deeply flawed understanding of how First Amendment and free-speech protections work on a campus and how these important rights are protected through institutions, their communities, and the courts.” They urge the department to follow suit with the religious student organization provision and rescind the rules to prevent further harm and “future mischief.”Under the rule, ED can find an institution out of compliance if there is a “final, non-default judgment” by a state or federal court that a public institution has violated the First Amendment or that a private institution has violated its stated free speech policies. Penalties could include withholding federal grant funds. However, because public institutions are already legally required to comply with the First Amendment and private institutions are required to comply with their stated policies on freedom of speech, the current rule offers no additional protections and actually diminishes these rights through the potential loss of grant funding. By permitting the termination of all federal funding based on a single court decision, the current rule is “breathtaking in its reach, and its real-world application is chilling and could lead to a variety of unintended consequences,” the groups write. They urge the department to remove itself from these sometimes complicated determinations and return to past practice of allowing First Amendment and free speech rights to be upheld by institutions, their communities and the courts. Section 2 Content Section 3 Content Section 4 Content Section 5 Content Section 6 Content Button Content Rail Content 1Related Links Statement: Free and Open Academic Inquiry and Debate on Our Campuses is Essential to Our Democracy and National Well-being Download PDF ACE, PEN America Resource Guide to Help Campus Leaders Make the Case for Academic Freedom and Institutional Autonomy Read More Rail Content 2 Rail Content 3 Related Podcast February 22, 2024 ACE’s Emmanual Guillory, senior director of government relations, joins hosts Jon Fansmith and Sarah Spreitzer to talk about the College Cost Reduction Act—the new Higher Education Act reauthorization bill from House Republicans. Read More Podcast February 22, 2024 dotEDU Live: Is Higher Education Act Reauthorization Finally Happening? News February 5, 2024 The House Education and the Workforce Committee voted to pass the College Cost Reduction Act, an overhaul of federal student aid, lending, repayment, and accreditation processes meant to be a significant step toward reauthorizing the Higher Education Act. Read More News February 5, 2024 House Education Committee Approves College Cost Reduction Act (None) ACE's division of Government Relations and National Engagement's federal legislative and regulatory agenda for FY 2024 focuses on five key areas. Read More (None) ACE 2024 Legislative and Regulatory Agenda News December 18, 2023 ACE and 17 other associations sent a letter Dec. 14 supporting a Federal Communications Commission proposal to restore open Internet rules. Read More News December 18, 2023 ACE, Higher Education Associations Advocate for Restoring Open Internet Rules Podcast November 16, 2023 Hosts Jon Fansmith and Sarah Spreitzer are joined by their ACE colleague Steven Bloom to discuss how the never-ending threats of a government shutdown are impacting funding legislation for higher education. Read More Podcast November 16, 2023 dotEDU Live: The Pre-Thanksgiving Policy Roundup News November 13, 2023 Along with CUPA-HR and a number of other higher education associations, ACE submitted comments Nov. 7 on the Department of Labor’s plan to update the salary level to qualify for the so-called “white-collar” exemptions. Read More News November 13, 2023 ACE, CUPA-HR, Other Groups File Comments on Labor Department Plan to Update Overtime Salary Levels News October 30, 2023 Following on the heels of a final rule on gainful employment and financial value transparency, ED last week unveiled a package of regulatory reforms aimed at giving the department more tools to hold high-risk educational institutions accountable. Read More News October 30, 2023 ED Releases New Rules on Institutional Accountability, Including Withholding Transcripts Podcast October 19, 2023 Hosts Jon Fansmith and Sarah Spreitzer discuss the House speaker race and its implications for the packed agenda—such as the ongoing spending battle—in Congress, as well as its impact on the Biden administration. Read More Podcast October 19, 2023 dotEDU Live: Chaos in Congress and the Higher Ed Agenda News October 10, 2023 ACE and a coalition of other higher education associations submitted comments to the DOJ on a proposed rule regarding digital accessibility requirements under the ADA. Read More News October 10, 2023 ACE, Higher Education Associations Advocate for Extended Compliance Period for Digital Accessibility Rule News October 10, 2023 ACE and other higher education groups sent a letter last week to the Department of Labor to educate and focus staff on the issue of college student mental health, which hasn’t received the same level of attention as youth mental health at the K-12 level. Read More News October 10, 2023 Associations Urge Administration to Prioritize Mental Health Care for College Students Podcast October 5, 2023 Scott Jaschik, formerly of Inside Higher Ed, joins the podcast to talk about what he sees as the top 10 leading trends shaping higher education this year and his predictions for what’s ahead. Read More Podcast October 5, 2023 Higher Ed Trends to Watch with Scott Jaschik News September 22, 2023 The House Veterans Affairs’ Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity held an oversight hearing Wednesday that examined the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) administration of veterans education benefits and featured testimony from ACE’s Anne Meehan. Read More News September 22, 2023 ACE’s Anne Meehan Testifies at House VA Subcommittee Hearing, Highlights Concerns with Implementation of Risk-Based Surveys Podcast September 21, 2023 A government shutdown is looming on the horizon, and ACE’s Jon Fansmith and Sarah Spreitzer are back to answer your questions and break down what this means for the higher education community, as well as other issues on this fall’s policy agenda. Read More Podcast September 21, 2023 dotEDU Live: What’s on the Policy Agenda for Higher Ed This Fall? News September 5, 2023 The Department of Labor has issued a proposed rule to update the salary level to qualify for the so-called “white collar” exemptions under the Fair Labor Standard Act’s overtime pay requirements. Read More News September 5, 2023 Labor Department Proposes New Overtime Rule News July 20, 2023 On Tuesday, ACE, in collaboration with the Presidents Forum, hosted a discussion on Capitol Hill to examine the Department of Education’s (ED) draft regulations regarding distance education. Read More News July 20, 2023 ACE Holds Capitol Hill Forum on Proposed Distance Education Regulations News June 23, 2023 ACE and nearly 50 other organizations warned the Department of Education in comments submitted June 20 that some of its proposed changes to gainful employment and a variety of other policies could be problematic. Read More News June 23, 2023 ACE, Other Groups Comment on Education Department Draft Gainful Employment Rule Podcast June 1, 2023 Hosts Jon Fansmith and Sarah Spreitzer are joined by Emmanual Guillory, ACE’s newest government relations staffer, to discuss the ongoing saga of the Education Department’s gainful employment rules. Read More Podcast June 1, 2023 dotEDU Live: Gainful Employment Rules 3.0, Student Loan Payments Return News May 15, 2023 The Department of Education has issued a response to comments received on the December 2022 Information Collection Request on Section 117 of the Higher Education Act, which mandates that institutions report foreign gifts or contracts worth over $250,000. Read More News May 15, 2023 Few Changes Expected to Federal Foreign Gift and Contract Reporting Requirements Podcast May 4, 2023 With the deadline to raise the federal debt ceiling fast approaching, Jon Fansmith and Sarah Spreitzer explain why the outcome matters to higher ed, including how it will impact budget proposals over the next few months. Read More Podcast May 4, 2023 dotEDU Live: Why Should Higher Ed Care About Debt Ceilings and Other Budget Battles? News April 3, 2023 On behalf of more than 80 other higher education organizations, ACE sent comments March 29 to the Department of Education about the guidance on third-party servicers that ED released in February. Read More News April 3, 2023 ACE, Other Groups Send Comments to ED on Third-Party Servicers Guidance Podcast March 23, 2023 Hosts Jon Fansmith and Sarah Spreitzer are joined by their Government Relations colleague Steven Bloom to talk about the troubling trend of elected officials intruding on academic freedom and restricting instruction on divisive concepts. Read More Podcast March 23, 2023 dotEDU Live: The Future of Academic Freedom on Campuses; Hope for HEA?