Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

 Email  Share  Print

Panel Reaches Consensus on Draft Rules for New Campus Safety Law

April 02, 2014

hallway

 

​The Department of Education (ED) panel working on draft regulations for the Campus Sexual Violence Elimination Act (SaVE Act), part of the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act signed into law in March 2013, reached consensus on proposed language yesterday in the last of its three negotiated rulemaking sessions​

The SaVE Act provision expands the information colleges must incorporate into their annual crime reports to include acts of domestic violence, dating violence and stalking, which “includes, but is not limited to, sexual or physical abuse or the threat of such abuse,” according to the final draft agreed upon by negotiators.

Among the revisions to ED’s working draft was the language dealing with victim confidentiality. Changes were made to address concerns that institutions would have to violate one requirement or another in certain situations. For example, if an institution moved an accused out of a dorm as a protective measure, confidentiality would necessarily be broken. 

The amended language acknowledges that conflicts can arise between keeping a victim’s information confidential and complying with the requirements to provide protective measures and to make crime information publicly available, and gives institutions the flexibility to ensure that protective measures are a priority.  

Regarding the mandate for “prompt, fair, and impartial proceeding,” negotiators agreed that proceedings must be “completed within reasonably prompt timeframes designated by an institution’s policy, including a process that allows for the extension of timeframes for good cause with notice to the accuser and the accused of the delay.” The original language did not allow for institutions to alter the timeframe designated in their policy. This revision provides flexibility for institutions and takes into account the realities of conducting investigations. 

ED established a strong policy stance regarding advisors in disciplinary proceedings by mandating that institutions cannot limit the choice or presence of advisors. Institutional counsels strongly opposed this provision as it would effectively remove private institutions’ ability to determine who has access to their campus if either the victim or accused opt to have an off-campus individual attend meetings. 

ED will publish the draft rule in the Federal Register likely before the end of the month, after which there will be a 45-day comment period. Final regulations are expected to be published before Nov. 1.​​

Other ACE News

  • July 2, 2015

    Today's Headlines

    HEADLINES: Today's Top Higher Education News

    In today’s headlines, the Los Angeles Times editorializes in favor of the U.S. Supreme Court affirming the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policy when the court rehears the Fisher case this fall. In other news, The Chronicle of Higher...

  • Institutional Capacity

    July 1, 2015

    Apply Now for ACE’s Institute for New Presidents

    New college and university leaders from all sectors of higher education can apply now for the 2015-16 ACE Institute for New Presidents, which is designed specifically for presidents in their first three years of service.

  • Supporting Student Veterans

    June 29, 2015

    Bob Woodruff Foundation Grant Extends Program to Train College Mental Health Counselors

    A grant from the Bob Woodruff Foundation will allow ACE to extend an initiative that trains college and university mental health counselors on how to better address issues such as post-traumatic stress and suicide prevention in their work treating...

  • June 26, 2015

    Education Department Scales Back Plan to Rate Colleges

    The Department of Education (ED) announced yesterday that it has scaled back the planned Postsecondary Institution Ratings System (PIRS) first announced by President Obama in August 2013.

  • Budget and Appropriations

    June 26, 2015

    Congress Moves Forward on Education Funding

    The House and Senate appropriations committees both passed their FY 2016 Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education bills this week, and the results were somewhat mixed for higher education.

 

 Related News Stories