Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

 Email  Share  Print

Supreme Court Hears Case on Reversing Michigan Ban on Considering Race in Admissions

October 16, 2013

Supreme Court


​The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday heard the second of two recent cases dealing with the consideration of race and ethnicity in college admissions decisions, this one a challenge to Michigan’s ban on such use at public higher education institutions.

The case—Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action—follows closely on the heels of another high-profile Supreme Court university admissions case, Fisher v. the University of Texas at Austin (UT). The court issued a decision in Fisher in June, reaffirming the notion that diversity on college campuses offers unique educational benefits to students and is a compelling government interest. It sent the case back to the lower court to reexamine to the constitutionality of UT’s admissions process.

In the Schuette case, a coalition of groups have challenged the Michigan ban, which voters approved in 2006 as an amendment to the state constitution. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit struck down the ban last year, ruling that it violates the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, which mandates that states must apply their laws equally to all individuals and groups of people.

As in the Fisher case, Justice Kagan has recused herself from Schuette, so the remaining eight justices will make the decision. Seven of the justices were very active in questioning the three counsels who argued the case.

“We would like to see the Michigan ban stricken so that each public institution could make its own decision as to the necessity of considering race or ethnicity in admissions to achieve diversity on campus,” said ACE General Counsel Ada Meloy after yesterday’s session. “However, our main concern, as we argued in our amicus brief, was that the court recognize and continue its Fisher holding that the educational benefits of diversity are a compelling interest and allowing consideration of race or ethnicity in compliance with law. We are hopeful our message was heard.”

If the Supreme Court strikes down the Michigan measure, the ruling could invalidate similar bans in California, Arizona, Florida, Oklahoma, Nebraska, New Hampshire and Washington.

Other ACE News

  • March 3, 2015

    HEADLINES: Today's Top Higher Education News

    In today’s headlines, The New York Times op-ed page looks at the debate over how to ensure high quality teacher education programs. In other news, The Chronicle of Higher Education writes about how the University of Pennsylvania is examining its...

  • ACE Annual Meeting 2015

    March 2, 2015

    ACE Annual Meeting to Feature Federal Relations Updates

    ​ACE's 97th Annual Meeting will provide valuable opportunities to obtain insight into what higher education leaders can expect from federal policymakers in the coming year.

  • Campus Internationalization

    March 2, 2015

    12th Cohort of Internationalization Laboratory Shares Steps Forward

    ​Members of the 12th Cohort of ACE’s Internationalization Laboratory joined in a robust discussion Friday, Feb. 13 in Washington during the mid-year seminar to explore several campus internationalization issues, with creating campus-wide buy in and...

  • Institutional Capacity

    March 2, 2015

    ACE Institute for New Chief Academic Officers Is Accepting Applications

    ACE is now accepting applications to its 2015 Institute for New Chief Academic Officers, which will meet in three sessions throughout the year.

  • Tax Policy

    March 2, 2015

    ACE, Higher Education Groups Support Schumer Tax Credit Bill

    ACE and 11 other higher education associations sent a letter Feb. 27 to Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) in support of his recently introduced bill to make a number of important reforms to the American Opportunity Tax Credit and Lifetime Learning Credit.


 Related Content