Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

 Email  Share  Print

Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Workplace Discrimination Case That Could Impact Campuses

November 27, 2012

SCOTUS

 

​The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in Vance v. Ball State University, a case that could decide who can be considered a “job supervisor” in a federal workplace discrimination lawsuit. 

The suit was filed by Ball State catering worker Maetta Vance, whose discrimination claim against the university was dismissed after a federal appeals court said her alleged harasser did not qualify as a supervisor. 

Unusually, both sides in yesterday’s hearing agreed the appeals court used the wrong legal standard for defining a job supervisor, saying the lower court test was too limited and that a supervisor could also be someone with power to direct an employee’s daily work activities. 

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states an employer can be held liable for discrimination against an employee based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Under longstanding legal principles, a corporation can be held liable for acts of its agents of sufficient authority, generally for acts of a supervisor. The Act does not define who may be supervisor, and the courts have differed on the topic.  

ACE and a coalition of higher education groups submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of Ball State, arguing that the lower courts had reached the right result and suggesting a definition of supervisor for Title VII purposes most appropriate in a higher education setting. 

 “The legal definition assists employers in identifying those who have meaningful control over other employees’ activities and who thus may reasonably be considered supervisors,” ACE General Counsel Ada Meloy told The Chronicle of Higher Education. “This is of particular importance to the higher education community as employers of over three million workers in a wide variety of jobs. The shifting nature of employee relationships, if subjected to a very broad definition of supervisor, would make colleges and universities liable for discrimination when there is no notice of events at a sufficient level of authority to take action to prevent or stop it.” 

The case will be decided by June 2013 when the Supreme Court’s current term ends.

Other ACE News

  • March 2, 2015

    HEADLINES: Today's Top Higher Education News

    In today’s headlines, The Chronicle of Higher Education explores how small colleges are adapting in the aftermath of the recession, and Diverse: Issues in Higher Education covers a report finding that nearly 22 percent of the nation’s community...

  • ACE Annual Meeting 2015

    March 2, 2015

    ACE Annual Meeting to Feature Federal Relations Updates

    ​ACE's 97th Annual Meeting will provide valuable opportunities to obtain insight into what higher education leaders can expect from federal policymakers in the coming year.

  • Campus Internationalization

    March 2, 2015

    12th Cohort of Internationalization Laboratory Shares Steps Forward

    ​Members of the 12th Cohort of ACE’s Internationalization Laboratory joined in a robust discussion Friday, Feb. 13 in Washington during the mid-year seminar to explore several campus internationalization issues, with creating campus-wide buy in and...

  • Institutional Capacity

    March 2, 2015

    ACE Institute for New Chief Academic Officers Is Accepting Applications

    ACE is now accepting applications to its 2015 Institute for New Chief Academic Officers, which will meet in three sessions throughout the year.

  • Tax Policy

    March 2, 2015

    ACE, Higher Education Groups Support Schumer Tax Credit Bill

    ACE and 11 other higher education associations sent a letter Feb. 27 to Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) in support of his recently introduced bill to make a number of important reforms to the American Opportunity Tax Credit and Lifetime Learning Credit.

 

 Related Content