Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

 Email  Share  Print

U.S. Supreme Court Hands Down Rulings in Higher Education Employment Cases

June 24, 2013

Pen

 

Along with Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the U.S. Supreme Court today issued two other rulings of interest to the higher education community—Vance v. Ball State University and The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar—and in both cases found in favor of the institutions. ACE submitted amicus briefs in support of both universities.

Vance v. Ball State University

Vance v. Ball State University focused on the definition of “job supervisor” in a federal workplace discrimination lawsuit.

The suit was filed by Ball State catering worker Maetta Vance, whose discrimination claim against the university was dismissed after a federal appeals court said her alleged harasser did not qualify as a supervisor. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, an employer is automatically liable for a “supervisor” who discriminates against an employee based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Act does not define who may be supervisor, and the courts have differed on the topic. 

By a 5-4 majority, the Supreme Court adopted the rule proposed by the employer. Justice Samuel Alito wrote that for purposes of this Title VII rule, to be a “supervisor,” a person must have the power to take a “tangible employment action” against the victim. Ball State prevailed in this case because the plaintiff could not show that she was discriminated against by her supervisor, rather than a co-worker, under the court’s definition.

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar looked at what employees must prove in order to prevail on a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act that their employer retaliated against them. The case involves a medical professor and physician who claims the university retaliated against him after he made a complaint of ethnic discrimination by a supervisor.

Title VII prohibits an employer from retaliating against an employee who has "made a charge, testified, assisted or participated in" any charge of unlawful discrimination. To prove retaliation, a plaintiff has to show that he or she suffered an “adverse employment action” as a result of the protected action.

At issue was whether, in a Title VII retaliation claim, the plaintiff had to prove that the protected action was the sole motive for retaliation (“but-for” causation), or just one of multiple reasons. Federal courts have split on which burden of proof is appropriate.

Writing for a five-Justice majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy explained that in a retaliation case, unlike in a discrimination case, the protected action must be the “but-for” cause, not merely a motivating factor. The Supreme Court therefore overturned the lower court’s decision, which found in favor of Nassar based on the incorrect standard.

Other ACE News

  • September 30, 2016

    Today's Headlines

    HEADLINES: Today's Top Higher Education News

    Inside Higher Ed looks at some of the issues raised by the low endowment returns experienced by a number of institutions. Janet Napolitano, president of the University of California system, writes about free speech issues on campus.

  • Credit for Prior Learning

    September 28, 2016

    Mario Sankis, 2015 Student of the Year

    Nominate Outstanding Adult Learners for ACE’s Student of the Year Award

    ​Nominations are open for ACE’s Student of the Year Award, which honors adult learners who show qualities such as perseverance, the capacity to overcome great odds and the ability to inspire others to set high lifelong learning goals.

  • September 28, 2016

    Female leader

    Limited Space Remains for the 88th National Women’s Leadership Forum

    ​Senior-level women administrators are invited to register for ACE’s 88th National Women’s Leadership Forum, an interactive program for those seeking a college or university presidency, vice presidency or major deanship.

  • Tax Policy

    September 26, 2016

    Capitol

    ACE, Groups Submit Testimony on Endowments to House Ways & Means Subcommittee

    ​ACE and six other higher education associations submitted testimony for the record last week to the House Ways & Means Oversight Subcommittee as a follow-up to a Sept. 13 hearing on college and university endowments and their potential impact on...

  • ACE2017 - ACE's Annual Meeting

    September 26, 2016

    Joichi "Joi" Ito

    MIT Media Lab Director Joi Ito to Address ACE2017

    ​Joichi “Joi” Ito, an internationally prominent activist, entrepreneur and venture capitalist, will be the keynote speaker at the ACE2017 Monday luncheon plenary session on innovation.

 

 Related Content