Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

Evolving Higher Education Business Models: Leading with Data to Deliver Results

 Email  Share  Print

Evolving Higher Education Business Models: Leading with Data to Deliver Results

December 30, 1899

This paper examines a network approach to leadership that creates transparency around institutional financial data using business model analysis. The network approach shifts shared governance from an emphasis on institutional dialogue and coherence towards institutional performance based on agreed upon metrics by empowering those on the front lines to make data-informed decisions that improve institutional practices aligned with performance outcomes.

As tuition levels rise, there are growing calls for fiscal responsibility and expectations that colleges and universities will use data to drive financial decisions and to tie expenditures to student outcomes. Many institutions, however, lack tools necessary to forge those connections and are forced to make financial decisions in the dark.

The paper supports the notion that financial decision making is best guided through business model approaches that prioritize data transparency, thus providing stakeholders visibility into the connections between expenses, revenues, and education outcomes. This level of transparency enables the exploration of the return on investment of cross subsidies across academic programs. In turn, this level of transparency requires an improved understanding of costs at the program and course levels, which will allow for data-driven program and course delivery.

As the higher education landscape continues to evolve, higher education leaders should continuously work to embed data-informed decision capabilities at all network levels, promote collaborative approaches to established performance outcomes, and utilize technologies that incorporate financial and outcomes data.

This report and its three accompanying appendix papers on financial data and change in higher education are funded by the TIAA Institute and were inspired, in part, by proceedings from a September 2015 ACE/TIAA Institute convening of college and university presidents, provosts, and chief financial officers who explored ways to improve the decision-making models pertaining to finance and innovation in higher education.




More on Institutional Effectiveness

  • September 21, 2016

    Statement by ACE President Molly Corbett Broad on C-RAC’s New Review Policy

    Statement by ACE President Molly Corbett Broad on the Council of Regional Accrediting Commissions' new review policy, which will further scrutinize institutions with low graduation rates.

  • August 10, 2016

    New ACE Leadership Program Designed Specifically for System and Campus Leaders

    The inaugural ACE and NASH Leadership Academy will support system and campus leaders in the development of high performing teams that facilitate large-scale change, enhance campus and system performance, and scale best practices across multiple campuses.

  • July 25, 2016

    ACE Blog Series on Data Offers Campus Leaders Ideas to Spur Institutional Change

    ​A recent three-part blog series on ACE’s Higher Education Today blog looks at financial data issues in higher education and offers insights for leaders looking to improve the way they use data in everyday decision-making.

  • June 20, 2016

    Q&A: Getting Past the Cost Conundrum

    In this exclusive Q&A, Rolando Montoya, provost of operations at Miami Dade College, shares best practices for boosting administrative productivity and graduation rates without breaking the bank.

  • June 20, 2016

    Which Top Priority?

    Increase degree and certificate production. Cut costs. Ramp up transfers. Prep more students for the workforce. Community colleges are being tasked with more and more priorities, but the result is often that nothing gets prioritized, and goals go unaccomplished—unless you remember what’s truly most important.