Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

 Email  Share  Print

Coalition Urges Congress to Close the Innovation Deficit

April 30, 2014

Close the Innovation Deficit

 

​Research and development spending in the United States has remained essentially flat over the past decade, while China and South Korea have boosted their investment 90 and 50 percent, respectively. Fifty science and research organizations, including ACE, called attention to this reality in testimony submitted to yesterday’s Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on “Driving Innovation Through Federal Investments.”

Testifying at the hearing were John P. Holdren, director of the administration’s Office of Science and Technology Policy; Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz; Francis S. Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health; France A. Córdova, director of the National Science Foundation; and Arati Prabhakar, director of the Defense Department’s Advanced Research Projects Agency.

Committee Chair Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) set the tone in her remarks, saying, “I agree reducing the budget deficit is important, but are we being so austere that we are limiting our future growth? And as one of the greatest countries in the world, are we so preoccupied with making budget cuts that we’re heading towards an innovation deficit as well?” (See below for Mikulski's full remarks.)

In their testimony, the 50 organizations continued the advocacy outlined in their “Close the Innovation Deficit” campaign, an effort to close the widening gap between the actual level of federal government funding for research and higher education and what the investment needs to be if the United States is to remain the world’s innovation leader.

Their remarks addressed that concept and noted the flattening of U.S. funding for research, much of which takes place at the nation’s universities, was exacerbated by sequestration. The organizations noted that “a subtle shift is taking place,” and as other countries invest more in research, the best talent will leave the United States, weakening American industry, jobs, security and the economy.

The organizations conceded that the private sector and universities themselves are important funders for research, but reiterated that “industry will never replace the federal role. Only the federal government can close the innovation deficit by supporting research on the scale, scope, and time horizon necessary to maintain our edge.”

The testimony was well-received on both sides of the aisle as committee members, Republicans and Democrats, echoed the organizations’ concerns over the course of the lengthy hearing.  

Follow the ongoing conversation on Twitter with the hashtag #InnovationDeficit.

Other ACE News

  • June 24, 2016

    Today's Headlines

    HEADLINES: Today's Top Higher Education News

    The Supreme Court’s decision in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin dominates this morning’s higher education news, with The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Associated Press just two of the media outlets covering the ruling. The Chronicle...

  • Law and the Courts

    June 24, 2016

    Gavel

    Supreme Court Affirms Constitutionality of UT Admissions Policy

    ​​The U.S. Supreme Court on June 23 issued its long-awaited decision in the second hearing of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (UT), voting 4-3 to uphold UT’s diversity in admissions policy.

  • Diversity in Leadership

    June 22, 2016

    Coworkers with computer

    ACE’s Spectrum Aspiring Leaders Program Helps Diversify Leadership Pipeline

    ​Designed to increase diversity among senior leaders in higher education, the October Spectrum Aspiring Leadership Program will combine interactive programming focused on honing leadership skills with networking opportunities and strategic career...

  • Higher Education Act

    June 22, 2016

    U.S. Capitol

    House Committee Approves Five Bills in Move Toward Reauthorizing the Higher Education Act

    ​The House Education and the Workforce Committee has approved five higher education measures focused on improving the financial aid process, enhancing consumer information and strengthening federal programs that support the work of minority-serving...

  • Diversity in Leadership

    June 22, 2016

    ACPS 2016-17

    Take the American College President Study Survey

    The survey is the oldest, most comprehensive and in-depth source of information about the college presidency and the leadership pipeline in higher education. Make sure your institution's president is included.

 

 Related Content