Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

 Email  Share  Print

ACE Supports University of Oregon in Graduate Student Discrimination Lawsuit

February 20, 2013

 

​ACE and six other higher education associations have filed an amicus brief in support of the University of Oregon (UO), urging the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a case arising out of a dispute with a former doctoral student who filed a discrimination lawsuit after her dissertation committee fell apart.

The university is asking the Supreme Court to review an appellate court’s ruling that allowed graduate student Monica Emeldi’s lawsuit to go forward.

Emeldi, a doctoral candidate in UO’s College of Education, took issue with her dissertation advisor’s critique that her thesis was too unfocused and that her methodology was flawed.

After she complained about her advisor’s assessment and lack of support, he resigned as her dissertation committee chair, having concluded that his continued involvement would be a barrier to her progress. When she was unable to find another faculty advisor, she dropped out of the Ph.D. program.

Emeldi subsequently sued UO under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, claiming the university had retaliated against her for vague complaints she allegedly had made to others about a lack of support and female role models for female Ph.D. candidates.

The university argues that the advisor’s decision to step down was based on academic judgment unaffected by discrimination. It is asking the Supreme Court to review the request for summary judgment denied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in its October 2012 ruling, or at a minimum, reverse it. That ruling found that the advisor’s resignation and Emeldi’s complaint of discrimination were “not completely unrelated” and said the case could proceed to trial.

“Candid back-and-forth exchanges between professor and student are essential to the dissertation process and innumerable other endeavors in the university setting,” the associations wrote in their brief. “Under the panel’s decision, a student may single-handedly transform a genuine academic disagreement into a triable issue of discrimination under federal law.

Accordingly, the decision will inhibit education by impairing the dialogue between teachers and students.”

The associations also supporting the brief include the American Association of Community Colleges, the American Association of State Colleges and Universities, the Association of American Universities, the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges, the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities and the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities.

Other ACE News

  • June 22, 2018

    Today's Headlines

    HEADLINES: Today's Top Higher Education News

    The Wall Street Journal covers President Trump’s comments that Republicans should wait until they have more solid majorities in Congress to pursue an immigration overhaul . . . The Washington Post reports that experts don’t see a likelihood in the...

  • Immigration

    June 22, 2018

    U.S. Capitol Building

    As House Bills Fail, Immigration Issues Remain

    House leaders reportedly have decided to delay until next week a vote on a compromise immigration bill, H.R. 6136, as party divisions—and commentary from the President—remain rampant.

  • Campus Internationalization

    June 20, 2018

    Map with pin in it

    Institute Investigates Complexities of Internationalization

    ACE’s Center for Internationalization and Global Engagement last week hosted the Institute for Leading Internationalization, a yearly convening designed to improve the effectiveness of anyone with a critical role in advancing internationalization on...

  • Credit for Prior Learning

    June 18, 2018

    Apple on a keyboard

    ACE Webinar: Credit for Prior Learning Policies and Accreditation

    There is still time to register for a June 21 webinar hosted by ACE’s Center for Education Attainment and Innovation focused on the role of accreditation in implementing Credit for Prior Learning policies.

  • Institutional Capacity

    June 18, 2018

    ACE2018 session

    Building the Foundations for the 2018-19 ACE Fellows Class

    Last week in Washington, DC, the 2018-19 class of the ACE Fellows Program met for orientation. The cohort members began building relationships that will sustain them throughout the year and laid foundations to maximize their learning.

 

 Related Content