 |
Implementing the SPIF/ePortfolio Approach
Lesson
Learned
Consider selecting a sub-set of the
outcomes and applying a portion of the rubrics. One of the project
institutions found that faculty and rating teams thought the rubric was
too long. In continuing the assessment process, they plan to work with
the faculty to adapt the rubrics into a smaller, more streamlined
package. In this way, they will gain greater buy-in with the university
community and create a more effective tool.
To be successful, an international learning outcomes and assessment
process should be endorsed by the leadership, situated in the broader
institutional context for assessment, and supported by key stakeholders
at the institution. Before plunging into the implementation of the
SPIF/ePortfolio approach it is advisable to evaluate
your institutional context for assessment, form
a team, and develop
an assessment plan.
When designing a SPIF/ePortfolio assessment plan, it is important to
consider several areas that may be relevant to your institutional
context. Critical areas for discussion include:
Adapting Tools to Specified
Learning Outcomes
The rubrics featured on this site were developed for a specific set
of learning outcomes. Do you already have a set of accepted
international learning outcomes that are explicitly included in courses
and/or programs?
- If Yes: Adaptation of the sample rubrics will be
necessary to align the rubrics with these learning outcomes. If you plan
to adapt the rubrics, who do you need to engage in this work to maximize
their acceptance by faculty and staff involved in teaching/designing
international learning experiences?
- If No: You may want to adopt the rubrics to
benchmark what is taking place implicitly, before an intentional
introduction of international learning outcomes.
Determining
Appropriate Scope and Scale for Implementation
The SPIF/ePortfolio approach was developed with the broadest
potential applications in mind, but when piloted by institutions in the
ACE/FIPSE project each institution set more specific parameters. More
information about the project's
projected and final samples is available. Your team will want to
determine the most realistic parameters for moving forward with a
SPIF/ePortfolio approach in light of what you know about your
institutional context for assessment. Can the assessment of
international learning be aligned with an institution-wide initiative
already underway to use ePortfolios? Or should this be approached in an
incremental way with a program, student sample, or faculty unit serving
as a pilot?
If the incremental approach is most appropriate, then:
- Is there a logical international program/learning experience (i.e.,
an education abroad program, global studies general education
requirement) that can serve as a pilot for this assessment
approach?
- Is there a logical student sample that can serve as a pilot for this
assessment approach? (i.e., education abroad students, honor students,
global studies students, senior global students capstone course)
- Is there a group of faculty or administrators who will be receptive
to piloting this approach?(i.e., global studies faculty, intercultural
communication general education faculty, resident director for education
abroad)
Many find it useful to begin with the questions that they will
ultimately ask of the resulting data. For sample questions that data
generated from the SPIF/ePortfolio approach can address, see Sample
Results and Analysis.
Please direct questions about this page to:
jill_wisniewski@ace.nche.edu
| Staff
Contacts
Download our information brochure
This page last updated on: 09/03/2008
| international learning outcomes, assessment, implementing ePortfolio, seeking approval, fpise, ace |
|
 |