 |
How Boards Go Wrong—And Right: Observations on the Search and
Selection of College Presidents

By Rebecca A. Denton and John E. Moore, Jr.
There is an old saw that college boards of trustees should always
have two items of business on their agenda. The first is the question of
whether the board has confidence in the president, and if the answer is
yes, the second item involves how the board can advance the president's
program. If, however, the answer to the first question is no, the second
item is the selection of a chair for a presidential search.
Although there is a good bit of hyperbole in this old saw, there is
also valid affirmation of one of the most important responsibilities of
an institution's governing board: Hiring and evaluating a president is
absolutely crucial to a college's—and a board's—success.
Effective leadership is a much prized commodity, and the leadership
challenges for presidents of colleges and universities have many
dimensions.
The late Clark Kerr, president and architect of the University of
California system, wrote with insight about the role and expectations of
the university president:
The university president in the United States is expected to be a
friend of the students, a colleague of the faculty, a good fellow with
the alumni, a sound administrator with the trustees, a good speaker with
the public, an astute bargainer with the foundations and federal
agencies, a politician with the state legislature, a friend of industry,
labor, and agriculture, a persuasive diplomat with the donors, a
champion of general education, a supporter of the professions
(particularly law and medicine), a spokesperson to the press, a scholar
in his own right, a public servant at the state and national levels, a
devotee of opera and football equally, a decent human being, a good
husband and father, and an active member of a church. Above all, he must
enjoy traveling in airplanes, eating his meals in public, and attending
public ceremonies. No one can be all of these things. Some succeed at
being none.
When a board must select a new president, it is challenging to find
someone who comes as close as possible to fulfilling this
multidimensional role. This challenge occurs with some regularity
inasmuch as about one out of seven boards of trustees is involved in a
presidential search each year. The good news is that more often than
not, boards undertake this strategic task in a conscientious,
deliberate, and systematic way, increasingly relying on the assistance
of search firms and ultimately finding new presidents who prove to be
successful. . . .
Excerpted from the fall 2009 issue of The Presidency. To
subscribe to the magazine, please call (301) 632-6757, or order online
through ACE's
bookstore.
| The Presidency, fall 2009, How Boards Go Wrong—And Right: Observations on the Search and Selection of College Presidents, John Moore, Rebecca Denton |
|
 |