Advanced Search
About ACEGovernment Relations & Public PolicyNews RoomPrograms & ServicesMembershipOnline Resources
About ACE
President's Welcome
Mission
Strategic Plan
Annual Report
ACE Board of Directors
Organizational Chart
Commissions
Washington Higher Education Secretariat
Advancement
Employment at ACE
Location and Directions
Print this page

Image


2006 ACE Annual Report

The Year in Review

The first decade of the 21st century has so far been marked by a growing acceptance of the fact that U.S. well-being is increasingly dependent on innovation and competitiveness in the global knowledge-based economy. Responding to the need for continued advances in fields such as national security, energy policy, and health care will demand the creativity and skills of an educated citizenry and workforce. Together, these factors have augmented the pressures on higher education, which in 2006, was the subject of several high-profile reports and a national commission. Of particular concern were the critical issues of affordability, access, and accountability, which shape academe's ability to serve students, families, and the nation's long-term economic and social needs.

Fortunately, the American Council on Education (ACE) was well-positioned to respond to these pressures. The Council's role as the unifying voice for U.S. higher education, as well as its longstanding engagement with the rest of the world, enabled it to identify the essential strengths of higher education, to unite the community to speak as one on important policy issues, and ultimately to bring about positive change.


Representation

Challenge: While our country's higher education system is generally recognized as among the best in the world, it must maintain that stature in an increasingly competitive global marketplace, in which colleges and universities are relied on as a continuous engine of innovation.

ACE Response:

  • ACE President David Ward served on the National Commission on the Future of Higher Education, a panel appointed by U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings, to define the major issues facing higher education. A final report released by the Commission made recommendations to the Secretary on how higher education can improve itself in order to remain competitive. While agreeing with many of the Commission's findings and recommendations, Ward was concerned about the lack of specificity in the report about the responsibilities of government, the private sector, and higher education to address the issues. He was also concerned about a failure of the Commission to adequately address the diversity of U.S. higher education institutions, with an implication of "one size fits all" solutions. Ward became the only Commission member to withhold his signature from the report. His dissent prompted discussion in the media of how higher education could use its own strengths to address its weaknesses.
  • By year's end, nearly 1,000 colleges and universities had signed up to participate in Solutions for Our Future, ACE's national campaign to raise awareness of the public good created by higher education. Throughout the year, the campaign continued its efforts at public polling, finding, for example, that less than one-third of the public believe that math and science classes for students not majoring in those fields are "very relevant" to life after graduation. ACE subsequently provided analysis of such findings to its members, pointing out the need for higher education leaders to do a better job communicating with the public about the importance of higher education to the economic success of future generations of Americans.
  • ACE joined with the other five major U.S. associations representing college and university presidents and chancellors to send a letter to higher education institutions outlining specific action steps on access, affordability, lifelong learning, and other key challenges facing undergraduate education. The letter also promoted collective engagement of the higher education community with state and federal policy makers.

Challenge: Each year, nearly 400,000 academically qualified students fail to pursue a postsecondary education because they cannot afford it.1

ACE Response:

  • ACE orchestrated the higher education community's response to underfunded student aid programs throughout the year. In the fall, ACE submitted comments to the Department of Education on behalf of 10 associations, regarding interim final regulations for the Higher Education Reconciliation Act, which would reauthorize the federal student aid programs that fall under Title IV of the Higher Education Act.
  • ACE convened higher education stakeholders to identify concerns related to two new grant programs signed into law by President Bush in February 2006, the Academic Competitiveness (AC) and National Science and Mathematics to Retain Talent (SMART) grants. ACE subsequently co-hosted a meeting with the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers and welcomed officials from the Department of Education to discuss proposed requirements, such as compelling institutions to analyze in detail all transcripts of first-year AC grant recipients.
  • The Student Aid Alliance, created by ACE and the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities, honored Sens. Susan M. Collins (R-ME), Tom Harkin (D-IA), Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA), and Arlen Specter (R-PA) for their efforts to ensure college access for qualified students, including their commitment to low-interest student loans and raising the maximum Pell Grant award.

Challenge: Increased federal scrutiny of higher education is accompanied by a growing emphasis on accountability, which often spurs unproductive and costly regulation that threatens to detract from the higher education community's resources.

ACE Response:

  • ACE continued to work closely with colleague associations to make improvements to the Higher Education Act reauthorization legislation, particularly in the areas of cost and transfer reporting requirements. This type of cross-sector collaboration is considered indispensable to preserving our community's core values and ensuring continued access and success in postsecondary education.
  • ACE filed suit against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding its move to expand the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act to include higher education institutions among those Internet service providers required by law to ensure that their networks do not impede law enforcement agencies from setting up wiretaps. The suit ultimately led the courts to find the vast majority of institutions exempt from the regulations, which could have required significant campus investments in new technology.
  • ACE led efforts to counter a variety of congressional efforts to expand costly institutional reporting requirements on topics such as peer-to-peer file sharing, charitable contributions on campus, and Title VI funding.
  • In the wake of a proposed change in the funding mechanism for the Universal Service Fund, ACE successfully petitioned the FCC to reconsider the proposal, which would have resulted in large-scale fee increases, particularly for some small colleges.

Leadership

Challenge: In order to lead their campuses effectively, college and university presidents must be adept at navigating rapidly emerging and often difficult issues.

ACE Response:

  • ACE proactively worked with the entertainment community to address shared concerns over the problem of copyright infringement through unauthorized campus peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing. ACE then distributed Background Discussion of Copyright Law and Potential Liability for Students Engaged in P2P File Sharing on University Networks, a white paper that helped institutions shape appropriate and effective policies and practices concerning file sharing.
  • ACE hosted two roundtables of college presidents and other higher education leaders to explore how colleges and universities are struggling to compete while maintaining public confidence in higher education. Through the subsequent essay Toward Higher Ground: Reclaiming Public Confidence in a Competitive Environment, produced with the support of Fidelity Investments, ACE offered strategies for college leaders to address the ways in which competition is undermining higher education's ability to meet its social purposes.
  • With support from the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, ACE began work to foster entrepreneurialism among higher education institutions, underscoring the importance of strong and creative leadership in balancing the bottom line with achieving mission-based priorities.
  • Joining with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and United Educators Insurance, ACE released Safety in Student Transportation: A Resource Guide for Colleges and Universities, designed to help reduce the frequency and severity of accidents during institutional trips involving students. Following the report's release, the National Transportation Safety Board praised the comprehensive nature of the guide as well as ACE's and NCAA's extensive efforts to educate college and university communities.

Challenge: The proportion of college presidents who are women more than doubled from 1986 to 2006, but the rate of change has slowed since the late 1990s. The share of presidents who come from each of the major racial/ethnic minority groups has changed little since 1986. With 49 percent of college and university presidents in 2006 at age 61 or older, higher education faces an approaching wave of presidential retirements—a prime opportunity to further diversify the office.2

ACE Response:

  • ACE consolidated all of its leadership programs under the new Center for Effective Leadership to better coordinate this critical part of ACE's strategic plan, and to more effectively address the emerging developmental needs of current and future leaders.
  • Because becoming a college or university chief executive requires a keen understanding of oneself and the search process and with support from Academic Search, Inc., ACE established a two-day workshop, Advancing to the Presidency, for vice presidents aspiring to the presidency. The highly interactive event offered candid conversations with search firm executives, coaching by current presidents, and résumé critiques.
  • The ACE Institute for New Chief Academic Officers (CAOs) convened its second class in 2006–07, providing practical leadership development through case studies, facilitated discussions, and executive briefings for CAOs in their first three years on the job. TIAA-CREF Institute supported this continuing program.
  • The Department Chair Program worked with nearly 300 department chairs to strengthen their leadership and conflict management skills.
  • ACE's Third Summit for Women of Color Administrators in Higher Education, supported by MetLife Foundation, engaged more than 130 attendees in candid conversations about the rewards and challenges of a career in higher education governance. Participants continued their networking via an interactive blog in the weeks following the meeting.
  • Through its seminars and on-campus experiences, the ACE Fellows Program brought together emerging and established leaders to explore solutions to the challenges facing campus leadership.
  • ACE named five university recipients of the 2006 Alfred P. Sloan Awards for Faculty Career Flexibility, totaling $250,000, enabling the institutions to enhance programs for promoting both structural and cultural change in order to create adaptable career paths for faculty.
  • In addition to the ACE State Networks and related initiatives, which reached more than 10,000 emerging and established women leaders, ACE staff traveled to several states to honor women higher education leaders, raising the visibility of these individuals.
  • ACE established the Women's Leadership Legacy Fund to support emerging academic women leaders and completed the quiet phase of fund raising with more than $100,000.

Service

Challenge: Although higher education has made significant strides in closing the achievement gaps among students according to their race, gender, or income level, sizable disparities still exist. For instance, African-American and Hispanic students still lag behind their white peers in the rate at which they enroll in college.3 And although men accounted for 42 percent of total enrollment at the graduate level in 2003–04, the gender balance varied tremendously by degree program and field of study.4

ACE Response:

  • Through The Unfinished Agenda: Ensuring Success for Students of Color initiative, member campuses received information, resources, and strategies for ensuring the success of underserved minority students. This initiative, supported by a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation, included a series of papers that provided presidents and their senior executive teams with specific strategies to encourage participation and persistence by students of color.
  • Analyzing data from the Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics and the U.S. Census Bureau, Minorities in Higher Education Twenty-second Annual Status Report highlighted the ground that remains to be covered in achieving full access for students from diverse backgrounds. The report was made possible with support from the GE Foundation.
  • With a generous grant from the MetLife Foundation, ACE created both English and Spanish editions of Jump Start Your Education, a student-friendly publication aimed at helping both students and their families prepare for college.
  • Gender Equity in Higher Education: 2006, an update to a 2000 ACE publication, revealed continued growth in the percentage of female undergraduates, but also dispelled the myth that women's success is coming at the expense of male students.

Challenge: Gaps in educational attainment rates are particularly acute in areas in which the United States relies on innovation: the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields.

ACE Response:

  • Increasing the Success of Minority Students in Science and Technology, the fourth ACE report in a series supported by the Rockefeller Foundation, showed that African-American and Hispanic students begin college interested in majoring in the STEM fields at rates similar to those of white and Asian-American students, but do not earn their bachelor's degrees at the same rate as their peers. The report outlined the challenge of moving traditionally underrepresented students in the STEM fields toward timely degree completion.
  • Following the release of this report, ACE sponsored a congressional briefing on increasing minority participation in the STEM fields, meeting with members of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce to discuss strategies that assist underrepresented minorities in these fields.

Challenge: Nearly one-third of first-year college students are placed into remedial courses, a situation that substantially reduces their odds of earning a college degree.5 Improved collaboration among higher education, K–12 education, and government is considered crucial to decreasing these rates and better preparing students for college.

ACE Response:

  • Joining with Lumina Foundation for Education and the Advertising Council, ACE began planning KnowHow2GO, a national public service campaign to encourage low-income and first-generation students to take the steps necessary to go to college. The multimedia effort will combine education, community-based, and government partnerships to raise awareness about what students must do to prepare for college.
  • In partnership with Achieve Inc., the National Association of System Heads, and State Higher Education Executive Officers, and with support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, ACE embarked on the Advancing College Readiness project, a national strategy to engage college leaders in preparing high school graduates for success, in either college or the workplace.

Challenge: With issues surrounding skills shortages, the graying of the workforce, and military service members returning to civilian life, higher education is being challenged to provide lifelong learning opportunities for an ever more diverse population of students.

ACE Response:

  • ACE began efforts with the Department of Veterans Affairs to create an infrastructure to support U.S. service members who have been severely injured and released from active duty. Partnering with counselors and case managers who work directly with the service members and their families, ACE's primary goal is to provide resources to help service members make informed choices of postsecondary institutions and programs of study.
  • Continuing its long-term relationship with the Department of Defense, ACE visited nearly 50 military installations and reviewed more than 600 military training courses and occupational specialties. This highly effective program led service members to request more than 45,000 transcripts be sent to nearly 2,300 colleges and universities last year, enabling them to advance their educations.
  • To further strengthen the American workforce, ACE evaluates courses from nearly 200 workplace and training organizations. Combined, ACE corporate and military registries hold the transcripts for 7 million adult learners. Institutional recognition of these transcripts broadens access to higher education, encourages retention and completion rates, and fosters increased enrollments in college and university degree programs.
  • In response to an aging workforce and the needs of older learners, ACE began research on the needs and expectations of learners aged 55–79, through the generous support of the MetLife Foundation.
  • ACE published a concise reference for college and university leaders who currently serve—or plan to serve—adult learners and who seek more information on this student population. Adult Learners in the United States: A National Profile summarized the characteristics and enrollment patterns of adult learners enrolled for credit in U.S. postsecondary institutions.
  • To communicate the benefits and value of GED testing and to enhance and protect the image of GED Testing Service (GEDTS) products and services, the program conducted focus groups as a first step in developing a national communications and marketing strategy.
  • In preparation for the 2011 Series GED Tests, staff met both with a national representation of high school teachers to identify the typical high school curriculum taught, and with military and corporate representatives to ascertain the skills and knowledge expected from high school graduates in the future.
  • Recognized for their ingenuity, dedication, and compassionate determination to maintain the integrity and the availability of the GEDTS program to Louisiana and Mississippi residents affected by Hurricane Katrina, ACE presented Extraordinary Service Awards to the GED administrators in those two states.

Challenge: The "flat world" is challenging U.S. colleges and universities to develop an internationalization strategy that will enable them to compete and collaborate in the global arena, ensure that they are preparing students for this new environment, and help them attract the best and brightest international students to the United States.

ACE Response:



Footnotes

1. Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. U.S. Department of Education.  Return

2. American Council on Education. (2007). The American college president, 2007 edition. Washington, DC: Author.  Return

3. Cook, B. J., & Córdova, D. I. (2006). Minorities in higher education twenty-second annual status report. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.  Return

4. King, J. (2006). Gender equity in higher education: 2006. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.  Return

5. Cohen, M., & King, J. (2007). Advancing college readiness through the American diploma project network. The Presidency. Special supplement, p. 1.  Return

About ACEGovernment Relations & Public Policy News Room
Programs & ServicesMembershipOnline ResourcesACE Archives
EventsSite MapContact UsPublications & ProductsHome

Contact | About ACE | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
© 2008 American Council on Education · One Dupont Circle NW · Washington, DC 20036 · (202) 939-9300