 |
Improving Lives: State and Federal Programs for Low-Income
Adults
Guidance on Evaluating Programs for Low-Income Adults
Many programs do a good job of addressing some of the challenges that
low-income adults often cite as barriers to their pursuit of
postsecondary education. However, a considerable number of programs
actually create barriers to postsecondary enrollment for low-income
adults through eligibility requirements, enrollment restrictions, or
inadequate funding. When reviewing the programs in the database, readers
should be aware of the following features that may limit the usefulness
of programs for low-income adults: Time Limits. Although most programs
cite financial self-sufficiency of low-income adults as a primary goal,
some programs (particularly TANF programs) limit the amount of
postsecondary education for which participants can receive work credit.
Programs that restrict participation in postsecondary education,
particularly those that limit participation to 12 months or less,
significantly lessen the ability of low-income adults to achieve
economic self-sufficiency.
Attendance Restrictions. Another aspect of some
programs that presents a barrier to low-income adults’ ability to
take advantage of postsecondary education is a requirement of full-time
enrollment with no provision for childcare. In 1999, more than half of
all low-income families were single-parent households (U.S. Census
Bureau, 2000). Juggling parental responsibilities and full-time
enrollment with few affordable childcare options is a major barrier to
pursuing postsecondary education for single parents, particularly for
those who must work.
Age Limits. Some student aid programs effectively
limit the age of beneficiaries by requiring that students must have
graduated from high school in the year immediately before receiving an
award. This is particularly common among state merit-based student aid
programs.
Income Restrictions. Tax programs in particular
often provide little benefit for low-income individuals. Tax credits
typically are not refundable, so the value of any credit is limited by
an individual’s tax liability. In other words, low-income
individuals may not have enough tax liability to take full advantage of
tax credits. This is typical in the case of the Hope Scholarship and
Lifelong Learning tax credits. The value of tax deductions or waivers is
calculated by using the taxpayer’s marginal tax rate, therefore
low-income individuals save less in taxes through these programs than
those in higher income tax brackets.
| Center for Policy Analysis, Improving Lives, guidance, Evaluating Programs, Low-Income, Adults, cpa, ace |
|
 |